Subscriu-te a la newsletter mensual AQUÍ

Is it worthwhile to be wrong?

Com et podem ajudar?

Deixa'ns un missatge i el nostre equip de professionals contactarà amb tu

Contactar

Aquesta pregunta ha sigut answer than “és it profitable per win the lottery?” Na beginning both affirmative but depends on which és la seva reacció en davant d'event or another, depending on how you invest and how you apply what you obtained, whether the lottery or whether the learning gained.

According to the politician and philosopher Marco Tulio Ciceró “es about humans being wrong but is by foolish people persisting on the error”. In my opinion, what truly results worthwhile és not doing a mistake but recognizing it.

Canadian researchers have found some evidence that as older we are, more we learn from our mistakes than from our success, and, all, that the learning from the trial-mistake is more effective for the memory than knowledge. 

Leave open the possibility be be rong and haveability of identifying and recognizing the error provides the companies a high opportunity for the development of the professionals, as well as for the evolution, growth and recognition (reputation) of the brand. La recollida de l'error a través del rebuig de les humanes, de la recollida de les branques per als clients, employees i society.

Els consumidors no expecten els seus brands per a infallible neither per a fer perfectes; they just want them to be honest sobre their mistakes. Les human nature makes us run away from those people that (apparently) don't have weaknesses and that never get wrong. Those attitudes generate problems connecting, trusting and engaging with the company.

Therefore, que l'organització ha de possibility be wrong (I am no et saying promotes) and ha adquirit i developed la capacitat i l'ability per reconèixer les misteques (I am no even saying que ha creat els canals) other qualities for what being recognize. Among those qualities I would highlight:

  •  Innovation: It no és possible per evolve i elevat sense assuming that there es possibility to be wrong, without recognizing that the correct path is not way the straight line. all innovation process, forced or not, entails.
  • Flexibility: For creating the process that protect the possibility of making a mistake and understanding that only from freedom emerges the trust and the creativity to evolve.
  • Objectivity: To és possible per a read en key of future i en positive way the situation that leaded us to the mistake, as well as we should avoid blaming the others about our mistakes
  • Transparency: It és una de les formes d'incorporar l'honest a les relacions humanitàries i empaties expected from a company or brand.In hyperconnected world transparency no és cap opció, és obligació.
  • Coherenceclosely related to the last point; la coherència és la shorter distance between what I am as brand and company and what I am saying that I am. Per coherent brand/company it would be easier (and cheaper) per fer possible mistakes.
  • Humility: It doesn't mean to recognize a weakness but to possess the wisdom and strength to know how to rectify.
  • And above all, the learning capacity: As Oscar Wilde said: “experience is the name we give to our mistakes”. The experience is what I am able to do with what I learned. El seu primer punt és que és company, brand (or són persones)..

    Però el most important, pel que fa a desenvolupar les seves proves, la imatge de que el projecte es pot adquirir a competitiva advantage que és difficult per a la seva competència, la capacitat d'engega i retain a talent per a la seva samarreta. . Creative companys i professionals, amb capacitat d'innovació, brau, honest, transparent, i coherent amb els seus behaviors i els seus ulls per a adonar-se i flexible, davant d'adversity i, especialment, s humilitat needed per llegir les misteques.

    Values de talent that in many cases the companies, and the society where we live, seem to waste when “retiring” by forces professionals that, at 50 years old, with bag full of experience, errors and good choices, mistakes and learning , and probably in the best moment of their professional life, We deny, i s we deny ourselves, l'opportunity do shorter (and therefore, more worthwhile) the path they already did, forcing us to go across this path again and probably make a mistake onze more.

    It not worthwhile committing, year after year, generation after generation, the mistake that we will be eternally young and lacked of the humility to recognize the value of the experience of thhose who already of the path before us and to not learning from them. Human is the only animal that stumbles twice on the same stone and, with him, all the entire society.
    Quan s'identifiquen el missatge, ens hauríem llegir entre ells i, as Ciceró said, ja que no és foolish to continue persisting on it





    Sebastià Fernández de Lara
    ca
    Suscríbete a nuestra Newsletter mensual

    Subscriu-te a la nostra Newsletter mensual

    Amb el resum mensual de les notícies més rellevants del sector

    Prefereixo rebre Newsletter a

    Sector laboral

    Política de Privadesa

    Gràcies per subscriure't a la nostra newsletter!